Ethics of stem cell research Essay

The employment of gentlemans gentlemankind immature rootage cubicleular phones is a significant breakthrough in the filed of biomedical seek. The capacitance to isolate, culture, harvest and manipulate chaff electric stalls presents a huge potential to feed new cells that will technically replace non-functional or degenerate cells in a forbearings body. Such revolutionary technology whitethorn possibly serve as a new treatment method acting for incurable and debilitating affections. Amidst the excitement within the scientific world for the promises obeisance cell research brings, there is a growing debate on the ethics that are associated with this novel technology.The collection and use of embryotic angry walk cells in the laboratory is dependent on the destruction of embryos. Such procural of biological material so warrants the termination of an embryo which directly represents the precise beginning of a human being (Robertson, 1999 Leies, 2005). Society has thus questioned whether the scientific world has ignored the absolute value of sprightliness in mass meeting for excellence in biomedical research. In a report name from the Washington post entitled Clash over al-Qaeda cell research heats up, Rick Weiss (2006) describes how basis cell research is perceived by two sides of the subject area. two sides engage aggressively habitd the media in parcel them air out their reverences and excitement, respectively, over the use of embryologic subject cells. The newspaper article was written and published a few days originally the Senate would meet to determine the fate of embryotic group cell research in the get together States. The stem cell research touchstone was initially reviewed in 2001 and indicated that research efforts on immature stem cells in the United States will not be funded due to ethical reasons.This new bill will thus take control of the 2001 restriction and will therefore allow funding of research programs on emb ryonic stem cells that remove been created as of August 2001. The bill aims to preserve and protect human embryos from their destruction, stock-still several scientific groups have claimed that this restriction has hampered their research efforts on regenerative medicine, and has alike resulted in the lag of research output. More importantly, other countries that are not restricted from performing embryonic stem cell research have gained a 5-years worth of research advantage over the United States.The feud regarding the ethical issues of embryonic stem cell research impacts the entire human population. Each individual in the society has a susceptibility to swerve a disease that might possibly need the use of stem cells that can replace defective ones in the body. We have heard of a number of public figures that have suffered from diseases that could have been resolved through the use of embryonic stem cells. The late former President Ronal Reagan suffered from Alzheimers diseas e and the late actor Christopher Reeve experienced spinal heap injury.Both of these individuals are prime shells of people who could have benefited from the results of embryonic stem cell research. Stem cells may be cultured and manipulated to differentiate into specific types of cells such as astrocytes or brain cells for Alzheimers patients, and neural cells for patients with spinal cord injury (Snow, 2003). However, nothing has been done since 2001 because the federal government has put a hold on any research activities that involves stem cell manipulation and experimentation.A solution to current debate on the ethical issues associated with embryonic stem cell research is the comprehensive explanation of the definition of embryonic stem cells. It is imperative that the non-scientific public meet the principles and techniques behind the generation of embryonic stem cells. It is also important that the public know that harvesting embryonic stem cells is not much different fro m abortion. It is also essential to at a lower placestand that the body of a human female biologically destroys or discards century of eggs cells through the natural course.The scientific group, in turn, should be patient enough to explain the area of embryonic stem cell research. I think that the ethical debate on the use of embryonic stem cells for research originates mainly from the miscommunication, misunderstanding and misrepresentation of the concept of embryonic stem cells. In addition, the public only relies on the information that is released by senators and stem cell research activists, who have actually distorted the concept of stem cell research.Should the scientific world be humble enough to example the basics of stem cell research, including the misnomers and benefits of the research, the ethical debate on this issue would decrease and might even vanish. The debate on the ethical issues of stem cell research is just one of several topics that have been under intense s crutiny by the public eye. Other issues of human concern include the employment of genetically modified organisms (GMO), organic foods, genetic applied science and biotechnology.It should be known that these technological innovations were basically created to improve the quality of life and not to destroy existing life forms. Everything that interacts with human beings has its benefits and disadvantages, yet these biomedical breakthroughs are the usual focus of attention of the public. However, if we weigh the benefits and risks of stem cell research, we will realize that the benefits of stem cell research far outweighs the disadvantages that may result from the use of this technology.We should always remember that decades ago, so many lives were disoriented from bacterial infection because antibiotics were not discovered yet. Today, antibiotics are a super C treatment regime for bacterial infections, which is a huge benefit to human health, but it also has resulting in the creat ion of drug-resistant strains of bacteria. The same setting may also be observed in terms of stem cell research, but we should intelligently consider both sides of the technology.