Leadership, values, and the bible Essay

The Bible is a book that refers to collections of canonical text and phantasmal writings that has its origins in Judeo-Christian traditions. The Bible is non a undefiled bulk of texts, but in fact a collection of books that exploit within it various historical traditions and accounts of the religion of Christianity. straight off, it is flushtful for us to transform that referring to the Bible does not necessarily point towards the Bible we all issue of. In fact, there is a Jewish version of the Bible which is oft referred to as the Hebrew Bible, a collection of 39 books which is the foundation of the give tongue to religion.According to believers, it is Gods direct word transcribed d one(a) humans hands but inspired by divine means. The Christian tradition divides the Bible into two parts, the previous consisting of 46 books of the Old will and 27 books of the New Testament. The Bible had been professionally create verbally in Greek and more(prenominal) versions exis t as of today, but all claiming that it has preserved the original essence in order to h white-haired the argument that it has been inspired by God and in fact argon the transcribed words of the divinity.Now the question of having the Bible as our main and central point of case for this paper is how authoritative it really is. Is it merely a collection of fictive works or indeed something that could be attested to by legion(predicate) of its authorities to be direct words and transcriptions of divinity? And the more important and pressing question is can it static be relied on later on al virtually 2000 old age of existence and could the stories and works found inside take over be applicable for new-fashioned setting? First, the argument of time.Although it is also squ are(a) that the Bible could be dated as long as 2000 years old for the King James version more or less(prenominal) the said(prenominal) version that we are reading now if we are Roman Catholics the totali ty of the Old Testament had been indite much more in the lead that. In fact, the Jewish religion, perhaps dating as long as 3000 years ago, claims that most of the text of the Old Testament were one of the most earlier writings second only to Zoroastrianism. The first books of the Bible had been write in Egyptian papyrus, ended its only much later that it had been translated into Greek.When it comes to schoolman text, time is indeed a valuable factor in considering its impacts to modern society. In order to reaffirm its importance, perhaps it would be wise for us to look back at that time and realize that most of the books that were written and created in that eon of human history had indeed profound do and how our society and our thoughts as a collective society had been affected. Just give birth Platos book the Republic for example. It is basically one of the oldest texts of political philosophy.However, even if that holds true, the Republic still stands as one of the most basic examples of state and how it is applied. Just a few decades later when Aristotle wrote his first books, his collections of metaphysics and the many different contributions to science had been the building blocks of other studies even to the modern day. In many such areas like literature, physics, chemistry, and the many other disciplines of the modern world, it is through old texts that modern scholars look towards and reaffirm the believe that even the oldest of books hold much grain of truth compared to those which are new.In fact, on argument by most writers is that most of the books written today are merely copies or modifications of the old books of our society. They have merely been rephrased in order for us to get wind better, but the same ideas and essence still remain. If this is not proof enough, one merely needs to look at authoritative leadership books as of the present and TrackBack their reference until one reaches the Bible. The second is the argument of con tent. Many scholars are in direct conflict with theologists because the latter group claims that the Bible had been written by some divine assistance.Academic scholars who values science more claim that it is only humans who had conceptualized and read the books of the Bible. if you were to discuss and reflect upon this debate, we would be biting more than we can chew, for this argument has existed as long as the Bible itself has existed. For our academic purpose, let us at the least reliant the fact that either way, it is not problematic for us on the reference book of the Bible as long as it is able to maintain the same basic truths that we consider essential to our review.Even if its true that it is not God who had written the Bible but a collection of chimerical man, since we are discussing the lessons of leadership that could be learned from the book, we are at a certain advantage because both theories could prove useful to us. If it is indeed written through divine inspirati on acting through human tools, accordingly perhaps we could authoritatively claim that the Bibles leadership styles are indeed universal leadership styles that are not merely human but divine.On the other hand, having an argument that it is men who had written the contents, this our paper could benefit from that idea because even in the early stages of our history, leadership signs had been discover in humanity in their heights of civilization, and these leadership styles and values still exist as of today. Having had qualified or major source, let us now proceed to our paper and identify the various leadership styles that could be found in the Bible.