Sexual Selection: Fact or Fiction Essay -- Biology Essays Research Pap

familiar Selection Fact or FictionDarwins surmise of sexual woof is an intriguing one because it offers an explanation of human nisus and cultural value systems. The theory is that domain who ar more sexually desirable leave contribute more offspring and thus their traits will be passed on to future generations to a greater extent than those of less(prenominal) sexually desirable humans. As opposed to Darwins other theory, natural selection, those who are the best adapted to their environment will be more potential to pass on their genes, or, survival of the fittest, you might call sexual selection survival of the sexiest. The theory is intended to in part formulate why, when humans diverged from other primates, the human brain tripled in size in only if two million years. At first glance, this theory besides seems to explain much of the motivation behind human culture and achievement. Upon closer inspection, in that location are some fairly conspicuous problems with it, especially when it is extended to get wind not only human ontogenesis in the distant bygone but it the present, but it may still be the most believable explanation available to explain why humans mental capacities have expanded so far beyond those of our primate relatives. It makes complete good sense that we would be biologically driven to prove our sexiness. At the most prefatory level, this could explain the plenitude and popularity of fashion magazines for young women and the emphasis on existence good at sports in school for both genders. Beyond this, it could similarly explain why men and women are driven to succeed at their various careers, or to be perceived to be successful, smart, witty, fun-loving, good-looking, responsible, or every of a number of things that human aspire to be which are also s... ...corded history. Even if this theory was once aline, it does not appear to hold true anymore, because those who we consider the most successful and desirable are no t producing the superior number of offspring, and so, the traits that are being selected for future generations may be exclusively different. Ironically, we may be spending our lives trying to prove we have traits which evolution is actually selecting against. References1) Creativity, Evolution and Mental Illnesses http//jom-emit.cfpm.org/1997/vol1/preti_a&miotto_p.html2) Evolution, Creativity, and ADDhttp//borntoexplore.org/evolve.htm3) Sexual Selection and the head A Talk with Geoffrey Miller http//www.edge.org/3rd_culture/miller/miller_p2.html4) The Mating Mind How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature http//www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.008