The Holy Virgin Mary :: essays research papers

What a sensation was made about the principal exhibition in the Brooklyn Museum of Art. The focus of Mayor Giulianis outcry was the bit The Holy Virgin Mary by Chris Ofili. Funny, he didnt make water attention to some of the other outrageous works including the pubescent womanish mannequins studded with erect penises, vaginas, and anuses, fused together in various postures of cozy coupling, or the portrait of a child molester and murder made from what appears resembling child hand prints or bisected animals in plexiglass tanks full of formaldehyde. Would it invariably have made headlines with a different title, like Afro-lady? I beginnert think so. I guess targeting religion gets a light too personal. Giuliani said, You dont have the right to government reward for desecrating somebody elses religion. If you are a government-subsidized enterprise, then you cant do things that desecrate the most personal and deeply held views of people in society. You would think that the go vernment paid these nontextual matterists, right? It turns out that the show consisted of Charles Saatchis privately owned collection VIEWED in a public museum. So what does that mean to you? Well, when I found out that tidbit of information, it didnt have the appearance _or_ semblance so offensive anymore. Taxpayers didnt pay these young British artists to realise controversial pieces. Taxpayers fund the museum itself to stay open. Museums have a variety of exhibitions exclusively year. What is wrong with having one displaying a private collection? This is a harsh thing with museums. Otherwise, how would the public ever get to view extensive dainty compilations of the wealthy? Some collections are beautiful, others perturbing. But, who draws this line? Who gets to decide? The individual. If you do non want to submit your eyes to horrendous, offensive creations, then dont Its interesting to note what happened to the art world after Duchamp revolutionized art into meaninglessn ess. Artists seem to be exempt from the moral laws that are binding to frequent people. Everything is O.K. under arts magic umbrella rotting corpses with snails locomote over them, kicking little girls in the head, rape and murder recreations, women defecating. Where does it abide? What is art and what is porn? What is art and what is disgusting? Where is the line? There isnt one anymore. The effect of Duchamps pranks was to point out that anything could be art. each(prenominal) it took was getting people to agree to call something art.