Theodore Adorno’s notions of ‘standardisation’ and ‘pseudo-individualism’ might be applied to contemporary pop music

Basing your discussion on an analysis of at least 2 coetaneous operatives or bands, consider the ways that Theodore Adornos nonions of standardization and humbug-individualism dexterity be applied to contemporary turn up practice of medicine. Do you probe whatsoever problems or shortcomings from this approach? fashionable Culture has enticed much research with the aug ment of media studies there ar a number of minds picking a set out what they see. With icons file up and saturating mediums much(prenominal) as television, magazines, radio stations to name a few, the celebrity filled industry is undoubtedly causing a conjure up amongst the clutches.Theodore Adorno (1903-69) emigrated to England in 1934 to escape Nazism. He awake(p)d in the United States of America for 10 years, (1938-48) before returning to upper-case letter of Kentucky, where he was a member at the Frankfurt Institute of Social Research. Theodore Adorno was a key figure in the field of trip up of o rdinary euphony and had intrinsic Marxist view on the capital nature of baseball club. Adorno believed that the ending industry is the central agency in contemporary capitalism for the production and rapture of false needs. (Adorno, T and Horkheimer, M. 1977, p349).He argues that prevalent medicinal drug is a passel-produced and shallow standardised part of the culture industry. This would suggest that all aspects of touristed medicinal drug including types of songs, song lyrics and separate of songs e.g. chorus, are all standardised. (Longhurst, B. 1995, p5).Popular unison is therefore divided into peculiar(prenominal) categories or genres of euphony such as vibrate, pop, rap, heavy metal and reggae etc, even according to Adorno, all popular music is standardised consisting of verse, chorus, bridge, that are convertible from unrivalled song to another. The effects of normalization are often underground by what the industry calls pseudo-individualisation. These are incidental differences, also kn birth as frills that are put within a song to disguise that it sounds the same.Adorno distinguishes sagaciously between pop music and serious music between noble culture and low cultures. Serious music, which he regards as sheer, Beethoven or Mozart for example, plays to the entertainments of the imagination offering an engagement with the world, as it should be.Especially due to this time interval his theories were often attacked for being elitist. The comparison of pop music and serious music was a of import topic for him. Adorno describes individuals who enjoy popular music muck up by immersion and open to the domination of industrialised capitalist systems. (Longhurst, B. 1995, p8). This view accounts for the emotional needs that popular music may fulfil as false and immature, rather than deep and/or pe bring inrating. Adorno continued to equate the cultivate with Tin Pan Alley and jazz orientated variations of it, ignoring the rise o f rock and roll in the early 1950s. This undermined his retrospect and resulted in his views generally being strongly rejected by more contemporary rock analysts. (Shuker, R. 1994 23).Adorno cl necessitates that Popular music is churned into a production line where everything sounds akin, its an industry that exploits us for dough and social control, to accept certain conditions about the world in which we live through a capitalist alliance. It would be fair to hypothecate that to virtually extent this is true. We do live in a capitalist troupe and in the music industry the process of absorption is achieved by capitalism through advertising and marketing of a product with a pop star or pop band. Everything about them becomes a commodity, their clothes, orbit, likes and dislikes etc, transcends its immediate useful use to become a key symbol of a hearty lifestyle. The argument implies that the rise of the popular music to mass status is a consequence of the symbolic stra tegies invested in it rather than the actual quality of the music.This basically means that although the products of the culture industry are alike in most cases, some individuality is consciously added to make it different from the rest even though essentially it is the same product. This is pseudo individualism. Adorno uses the Hollywood star system as an example, the more dehumanised its method of operation and content, the more diligently and successfully the culture industry propagates supposedly great personalities, and operates with heart throbs. (Adorn, T. 1991, p87).A modern-day day example buttocks be seen in boy bands such as Westlife, Nsync, Backstreet boys and the most recent One true enunciate derived from Popstars the rivals, a overrefinement of show produced originally as Popstars in January 2001. Although the music is very similar in structure, tonality and content, the customer can choose between several(prenominal) versions of these boy bands.It could be sug gested, the culture industry produces culture, which the masses consume thoughtlessly and are thus confirmed as unthinking. It is a culture which produces satisfaction in the here and now, depoliticising the working class, limiting its horizon to political and frugal goals that can be achieved within the oppressive and exploitive framework of capitalist purchase order. (Storey, J. 1998 p188).The hearing, through a selection process selected the new boy band, One True Voice over a number of weeks. A mathematical group of 5 males aged between 17 and 22, they do crack into a typical boy band category. They released a Christmas song called numinous Trust which is actually a cover version of another male group the Bee Gees. Adorno would claim that we as masses consume everything the product line churns out and on a personal level I would agree as this appears to be both standardised and contains pseudo individualism as it is sung by a new group with added frills however this has been apparent in popular music for generations and manufactured groups will continue to use this method in order to generate more sales. We live in a consumerist society where these manufactured groups are providing a service for their audience. A major critique of this is that Adorno does not look at the emotional response of the audience and how standardisation is also a material body of pleasure. By this it means that standardisation is a form of security for the audience and this predictability is often welcoming.Adorno and other writers of the Frankfurt school, curiously Herbert Marcuse (1898-1978) sees the process of the culture industry as a means of capitalist society to stabilize itself.Theodore Adorno claimed that popular music operates as a wight of social cement. Although his writings was published in 1941, his accounts on popular music does not account for the complexities of recent popular music and popular culture. He is heavily criticised due to his unchanging eli tist views and it would be fair to say that popular music is not as monolithic as Adorno claims.The perspectives offer a relevant but quite pessimistic and what can be considered as narrow minded views of popular music. They name offered free-baseations for interpretation and collar of music however many theories since have built on how audiences contextualise and use the products of mass culture rather than what the culture industry does to the audience.Antonio Gramscis (1891-1937) work on Hegemony loose many doors for thought, including ideas that members of society negotiate with the products of the culture. (Fiske, J. 1992, p309). Hegemony helps identify that popular culture is not simply imposed on the subordinates by the bourgeoisie and that people are not simply passive and helpless mass incapable of favoritism and thus at the economic, cultural and political mercy of the barons of the industry. (Fiske, J. 1987, p309)Fiske suggests that audiences make water contrasting ideas from different text. Madonna is a fine example where pleasure of the audience is in the power of a severely suboridatly subculture to make their own statements and own meaning. (Fiske, J. 1987, p233)These theories have their strengths and differences in helping unpack the arras of music. One element they all share is the acknowledgement that pop music has important social effects. Who are the main consumers of popular music? young person are high upest consuming marketing within pop music accounting system for the highest percent of single sales. Bradley (1992) accounted the significance with youths and music as reaction to ship war teenager with an increase in disposable income and new view in society. James Coleman (1961) highlighted the separateness of youth culture from adult society and its closeness to the market through consumption of popular music. Consumption has been cogitate to youth culture as far certify as the 50s, where ontogeny western markets created specific products and goods for the teenager. (Wulff, H. and Taliai, A. 1995).An example of success in popular music is Madonna. She is a key figure in the pop industry as a pioneer for breaking conventions within gender and rideuality, and has been around for 3 decades, now in her 50s still appealing to the youth, However much roll on Madonna has taken place focusing on her image rather than her music. She has been perceived as the lowest form of irresponsible culture a social disease and an inauthentic product of the culture industry who was twisting of the exploitation of others of the gain of that industry. (Bryman, A. 2001).In relation to Adorno he may have perceived Madonna to be a cultural product, taking pseudo individualism to an extreme, which in turn made her very popular. Madonna moves from discordant genres of music and blends them together she had a hit record with Dont cry for me Argentina a more operatic song very different to what is considered mainstream music. I tactile sensation that Adorno would have critiqued this as popular classical as she took something that can be considered elitist and brought it into popular culture.This view is contrasted with her comparison as an organic feminist who allows girls to see that the meaning of feminine sexuality can be in their control, can be made in their interests, and that their subjectivitys are not necessarily completely determined by the dominant patriarchy. (McClary, S. 1991.)McClary in her analysis of Madonna has found her to be exceptional as a participant who has endured maintained an unlikely amount of power as a successful female artist over three decades. A simple look at her back catalogue and it is apparent that she uses sexual power as a commodity alike many women throughout western history. Including seventeenth century composer Barbara Strozzie, who was one of a few women who broke through the elite circle of classical music, by posing bare breasted for publicity. It would b e very kindle to know what Adorno would account for that. (Rosand, E. 1986).Madonna however brings hypocrisy to the surface and problematizes it. With publications of her book, sex and video discourses like in Bed with Madonna She takes a key type in the aggressor sexually. She connects the notions of power and sex and projects it back outwards into the main stream hands on hips Gautier bust pointy and proud. Her intentions never simplistic, it is mathematical her representations aim to detach stigmas and notions of taboo to certain sexual matters. This may lead to great tolerance for those engaged in these perverted practices and a layered stream of meanings dipictable from her messages. jeering has been depicted as a key strategy in her possible master plan. In Like a Virgin her little girl voice and play with signs of famous temptresses, her pouts, her coquettish nature and using traditional music signs of childish vulnerability projecting her knowledge that this is what patr iarchy expects of her and also her consciousness that this fantasy is ludicrous. (McClary,S. 1991, p153).A principal factor in the understanding of Madonna messages is the language of cultural experiences and perceptions that she speaks to her audience with. Madonna gives her audience standardisation in the sense that some of her music can be sliced and changed however she also gives her audience challenging and contrasting views about being a woman in todays society, that could be argued against Adorno as being engaging, scrutiny and also plays to the pleasures of the imagination offering engagement to the world as it is now.Her audience within popular music are aimed specifically at the mass (for financial and wider broadcast of her messages) and as evidence in that she plays for the lowest crude denominator-that she prostitutes her art an extension of her self. Prostitution is a service never the less, and it lucid that she uses her role to play with traditional boundaries an d identities. Madonna uses the tool of fantasy a mode typical of the culture industry, however she here compliance to the powers stop, as she twist notions within them. Her fantasies have been seen as ambiguous and unsuccessful for men and she has been compared to a genuine Boy Toy as male interpretations and reactions to a bulk are often that of anxiety and unease rather than appease. (Rolling stone 508 prove 28th 1989). On the other hand, the power of Madonna is undoubtedly clear, her great empire of her Production Company, her own music label and a net value of 600 Million speaks volumes about her nature as a business women as well as an artist and social figure.It is fair to say that that although popular music in todays generation can be considered as standardized, and to a great extent, manufactured music will always be so, Adornos views are out of date and biased as he had a very low opinion of popular music. Being a musician himself, his opinions were based on his own assu mptions of high and low culture and although he did make some substantial claims about standardization and pseudo individualization, popular music today has more important factors to be dealt with such as the messages it is portraying. One being that we do live in a consumerist society where essentially everything is a product, even classical music today, which Adorno would have considered high art is now commercialized and used as a commodity to sell through advertising. Through it all music captures a outcome or feeling that Adorno does not account for. Music is another form of expressing an emotion whether it is classical or pop music and it is there for enjoyment, to try a service and an option to listen to whatever pleases the ear.