'Business And Environment Interaction Essay\r'

' insertion\r\nDealing with factors in the remote environment is a crucial part of corporate survival, stability and offshoot. This is peculiarly recognized when a bulletproof is operating internation bothy where barriers to entry and liability of hostileness serve as aggravation to the challenging task of responding to external forces. The transcription bottomland remain indifferent despite environmental forms and eventide so accumulate revenues.\r\nBut as flow rately as its mediocrity and irresponsibility achieved their tolerance limits, the preliminary competitive slur of the organization get out in all likelihood be unreachable and eventually leave behind swim into demise. This issue is near alarming to Coca-Cola who is the up-to-the-minute attraction in change throws and iodine of the well-known brands in the blue imbibition fabrication. Even with its current position, external forces ar skilled protagonists continuously testing its current dodg ing and asking, â€Å"Are you capable of retaining your position?”\r\n appellative of External Forces\r\nThe European food market is recently discovered castrates in taste and preference for drinks. The trend is little consumption of carbonated mathematical wares and increasing film for non-carbonated and still drinks. This is happening since 1998 and a handful of investigate institutions substantiate this phenomenon including Mintel and Canadean. Financial results of Coca-Cola too remained flat for its sugary carrefour filiation era caller-up report is expecting hereafter based on the focusing expansion in its still drink.\r\nThe market becomes more(prenominal) health-conscious and concern towards nippy but un hefty drinks is in progress. In growth to sugar, artificial additives and flavors atomic number 18 blacklisted characteristics of soft drinks for today’s consumers. The complexity of customers especially in real countries is a key conce rn for Coca-Cola as this market is little sensitive to price and be impulsive to liquidate more for healthier products.\r\n Environmental factors realize a close relation to the shift in amicable attitudes against carbonated drinks. With bimestrial hot weather fixed doneout the year as what happening in UK and other neighbouring countries, the shift to still and non-carbonated drinks testament be minimal. This is because physiological issues are stronger than self-expression and more people are willing to risks adverse effect to long-term health in return of enjoying carbonated drinks.\r\nIncreased sentiency of the effects of non- perishable products to global warming and pollution as well affects the extent of the shift in preference. Ozone-friendly betterment is an extra feature that drink products must possess to come-on the market much(prenominal) as the use of biodegradable plastics. With regards to bottled water manufacturers, their health adv ocacy and constructive reception of the market is adverse affected by its qualifying to economy of continuously decreasing of quality water in the UK. This basals that they whitethorn not be able to supply the widening market demand for healthy drinks due to scarcity of resources.\r\n With pressures from social and environmental factors, soft drink manufacturers find stark naked ship postal to reserve and outgrowth their market care. This caused motivation within the manufacture to result look for and development to fashion soft drink products that possess hybrid features that addresses health, environmental and taste ineluctably of the market. Hampered by the fact that the botany and facilities of manufacturers are fixed, the importance of serving the shift in market preference is concretized as they are willing to change the current flesh despite increase in follow and induce change.\r\nIn its website, Coca-Cola advertise its products as complete w hich means that drink aspects such as style, taste, variety and health are realized. This hatful be obtained by introducing sassy products such as vegetable drinks, drinks that have anti-oxidant properties and exotic drinks. Innovative packaging is similarly an important source of product competency such as the use of biodegradable plastics for juices and dairy farm drinks while tetra-type of packaging has supply chain benefits with longer shelf life and efficient storage compatibility.\r\n With all the efforts and financial loss shouldered by manufacturers to result appropriate products in terms of demand, government regulation aggravates the difficulty manufacturers are facing. strategical opportunities such as art combinations with local companies are filled with repressing features while merging with larger companies are confronted with just law. The contracting sales in carbonated products may force Coca-Cola to merge with competitors to save cost thr ough elimination of repetitive processes and assets. The need to innovate invigorateder products may also induce others to educate local companies that have the knowledge of market characteristics.\r\nThese strategies are not tardily available especially when the firm operates internationally. Stricter quality standards can nurse market leaders such as Coca-Cola from the threat of unexampled entrants. However, this depends on the grammatical construction and disposition of political system in the host hoidenish. For example, unethical marketing conducted by some companies labelling their cola products as â€Å" slight sugar” even if the laboratory tests showed that in that location is substantial amount of sugar in the product. With lead legal and political framework, market leaders such as Coca-Cola can survive the reduction in demand for carbonated products.\r\nAssessment of Implications\r\nIncreased mundaneness of customers will results in high product spe cialization within the industry. Traditional benefits of economies of scale achieved in the product of carbonated drinks reached its zenith due to the shift in preference. With the lifestyle of people and engineering going forward, it is unlikely that good deal production of carbonated drinks will re-emerge as the industry’s occupation model. Technological advancement enabled manufacturers to compete based on origination.\r\nIn contrast, entirely few are willing to invest heavily in research because of high risks associated with a new product in both corporate and market response. This triggers the lucrative dodging of buying companies that offer the facilities and technical know-how. Government regulation, on the other hand, will implement delays through litigation if not disapproval to business combinations that can impose strategic bottleneck in a company’s first promoter aspiration and future profitability. Even if allowed, merger and encyclopaedis m has a historical proof that confirms problems in pre-, during and post-merger/ scholarship phases.\r\n To further understand the implications of external forces on soft drink companies, it is required to study the industry’s strategic space and profit jackpot. Since 2006, Europe is receiving the legal age of product introduction to address the sophisticated demands of the parting in terms of nutrition and lifestyle. A derive of these products showed innovation by creating exotic and atypical flavours while packaging is made convenient for kids. The search of take account by manufacturers is present in all split of the honor chain, that is, from formulation of the drink up to the scattering of the finished good.\r\nTherefore, the usual cost-savings derived from volume-based strategy of carbonated drinks will be ineffective in present scenario. merchandise campaigns concerning the impact of soft drinks on the heart is the current confaceration of man ufacturers which concretize that issue of out-of-the-manufacturing activities to derive value from the products. As much as manufacturers want to surmount in all the areas of the value chain, there are financial and structural constraints. For example, the bottler’s margin is adversely affected whenever a client-manufacturer introduced new drinks that involve new bottle design.\r\nAs observed in infix 1, innovation in the soft drink industry can maintain and attract market which is the radical of revenues. However, the manufacturing processes and forward/ backward suppliers are the areas where the bottom-line is dictated. Without innovation, the current bodily structure of the industry can survive the impact of the change in consumer references. This is especially true for carbonated drink manufacturers like Coca-Cola.\r\nReplacing the manufacturing process to introduce innovation such as non-carbonated or still drinks would require replacing also the machineries and perhaps the entire plant. encase would require less acid resistance, delivery enrolment would change depending on package design or expiration date and distribution networks may break to carry the product awaiting positive reception. As a result, a major source of margin of the company will be undermined due to high be of manufacturing change. On the other hand, if Coca-Cola remains to focus on carbonated drink, it will confront a conquerable future earnings and market share.\r\nDifferentiation strategy and innovation has a more long-run positive impact to Coca-Cola. It is also suited for a leader in carbonated drinks and perhaps one of the most reputable beverage brands in the world. The profit pool reveals that the carbonated products remain the highest margin and revenue endorser in the soft drink industry. However, forecasts threatens this position with the healthy/ sugar-free products pulling substantial value followed by the same impact from non-carbonated produ cts such as sports-energy, juice, dillutable and bottled drinks.\r\nIn the long-run, those who will choose to retain a cost leaders strategy and keep large stocks of carbonated drink will face declining sales. On the contrary, there are also disadvantages in differentiation strategy and innovation that present in regulation, challenge to marketing and teddy of traditional plant. In an operating environment with doubtful customer response, intense competition and restricted action, both action counts and one mistake can mean millions of investment lost. Therefore, consideration of important issues such as creation of sustainable value including financial matters is pilfer priorities.\r\nConsideration of Responses \r\n tumid desegregation is the recent closure of Coca-Cola to address changes of external factors. This is observed of its development of a bottling subsidiary to remain cost-effective and flexible. This is a major step for the firm not precisely as traditional set-up only allows efficient bottling operations by third party suppliers but also it will avoid hindering the innovation feats of Coca-Cola such as demand of new packaging. The fact-paced environment vulnerable to new innovation from competitors and suppliers, thus, is mitigated by this strategy. Further, government standards such as carbon dioxide emission can be addressed through a more integrate plan.\r\nFormally, Coca-Cola has to put preference to bottling companies that are not only cheap and quality producer but also has an environmental compliance for manufacturing wastes. With the creation of its own bottling segment, it also solves the problem of increasing government intervention in social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing firms. Coca-Cola can drop dead less on environment-related and supplier search costs which impact can extend up to environmental-conscious customers.\r\n Vertical integration is not only noticed in the manufacturing proc esses of the firm but also in heed structure. Committees for marketing, strategy and innovation are considered one execution body where the action of one has influence or can be influenced to/ by the results of other committals. The new structure would allow a cost-efficient and compound recognition of problem and opportunities in the environment. Recently, the efforts of the consolidated committee are focused on the project of customer-retention to maintain lead particularly in carbonated drinks as well as increase market share in non-carbonated drinks.\r\n With their close collaboration, they easily identify that the issues of inactiveness and obesity, low level of quality and quantity of water, change in market preference and intense contestation have adverse effect to financial surgical process of the firm. Instead of spending glamorous but undue advertisements, the expensive budget is invested on market research which rationalized the actions of each department. The difference in today’s environment for Coca-Cola is that its leadership is threatened and careful strategy is a must to optimize its resources amid innovation, expansion and research costs demanded by the unpredictability in the environment.\r\n In its global operations, there are regions that exemplified performance growth but only a few to hint such as the Middle East and Latin American countries. For the European market, however, the reverse is true. This induced the firm to bring home the bacon a bottling company in Germany to forget the same cost-savings of vertical integration from its major manufacturing plants. The strategy is a smart tactic because the decrease in revenues can be mitigated by ability in production and distribution. Acquisition in foreign countries also indicated the intention of Coca-Cola to expand its product line in an international scale.\r\nThe German experience, however, incidentally indicated that the cost of doing busine ss will rise because labour and technology in the country is relatively expensive. The good side is that quality of production and potential innovation necessary to compete in the current industry structure can magnify.\r\nAs early as 2004, Coca-Cola is in a mission to integrate host country facilities for better coordination, synergy in resources and manufacturing flexibility. In Japan, it developed a centralized value chain design to restructure the operations based on the business management and relationship traditions of companies. In this country, where linking for long-term partnership, it is easier to conduct business when the company is implementing a strategy as a whole and based on the point of its partners.\r\n A decade from now, the soft drink industry will be dictated with high product differentiation and the company who can find valuable competency in its innovation would be the leader. This is a path that Coca-Cola is undertaking. Its financial depth and reputation enabled it to bring forth important parts of the value chain to protect its carbonated products from significant decline and also to run across the innovative demand of non-carbonated and new-age drinks.\r\nIt used its historical leadership position to protect its market share even tough it partially lagged innovation feats for still drinks. Its biggest challenge, however, is to acquire a useful innovative product that can compete with new-age drinks. Its carbonated drink surely fix complacency to have at least a constant growth by vertical integration but improving on non-carbonated drink demands more work. It is expected that in the future it is able to acquire a non-carbonated firm without intervention from government regulation. Otherwise, it would be force to develop innovation internally which is less clear.\r\nConclusion\r\nCoca-Cola is on the right track when it comes in attacking the external forces head-to-head. It is diversifying its operations, in tegrating its resources and adopting to local needs in its quest in finding sustainable value. There are odds such as government regulation apparent in the blow of acquiring a vendor-made innovation in the non-carbonated product that can pump-up the stagnant financial performance of the carbonated drink.\r\nSo far, however, the company is doing its share in resolution the unpredictability and spontaneity of the external environment. It is able to decrypt that the external forces are sometimes like eye mask in relation to each other. That is, the change in one (e.g. climate change) can lead to some other (e.g. change in consumer preference). As a result, it is one step away from assuring itself that its leadership position is out of threat.\r\nBibliography \r\nBaird, S. & Deal, W. (2003). Consumer information viands constitution Nutrition information Regulations. The Technology Teacher, 62, 43-50.\r\nCapps, O., Kim, S. & Nayga, R. (2001). Food Label Use, Self -Selectivity and Diet Quality. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 35(2), 346+.\r\nCoca-Cola Website, viewed on 2 May 2008, <www.thecoca-colacompany.com/investors>\r\nDean, D. (2004). Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity: make of Corporate Reputation, Response, and Responsibility for a Crisis Event. The Journal of calling Communication. 41(2), 192+.\r\nEuromonitor, viewed on 2 May 2008, <www.euromonitor.com>\r\nFoster, F.D., and S. Viswanathan , 1994, Strategic art With Asymmetrically Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information, Journal of pay and Quantitative Analysis , 29, 499-518.\r\nHitt, M, Hoskisson, R & Ireland 2003, Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization, 5th Edition, South westerly; Thomson Learning, Singapore.\r\nKotler, P 2003, Marketing Management, 11th Edition, Prentice manse: NJ.\r\nNavder, K. (1993). Genetically Modified Foods: A Growing adopt Plant Biotechnology Can Help to overwhelm the World’s Concern for Feeding Its Eve r-Growing state Food and nutrition labelling: past, present and future. School of health Sciences.\r\nNutraingredients Website, viewed on 2 May 2008, <www.nutraingredients.com/news>\r\nProctor, T 2000, Strategic Marketing: An Introduction, Routledge, London.\r\n \r\n'